Wednesday, July 5, 2023

“When Guns Were Aimed at Native Americans, It Was Under Control. Now Guns Are Aimed at Urban Communities, and It's Not a Priority. Why?




Abstract 


For centuries, the United States government has used guns to target Native American communities. This violence has been met with little public outcry, and even been seen as a necessary part of "civilizing" the continent. However, when guns are aimed at urban communities, the response is very different. These communities are often seen as "dangerous" and "crime-ridden," and the violence that occurs there is often dismissed as inevitable.


This essay explores the history of gun violence against Native Americans and urban communities, and asks why the response to these two forms of violence is so different. It argues that the way we talk about gun violence is shaped by our own biases and prejudices, and that these biases have led to a situation where gun violence against Native Americans is seen as "under control" while gun violence against urban communities is ignored.


The essay concludes by calling for a more just and equitable response to gun violence, one that does not allow our biases to dictate who is seen as worthy of protection.


Here are some additional points that could be included in the essay:


  • The history of gun violence against Native Americans is often overlooked or erased.
  • The way we talk about gun violence is often shaped by stereotypes about Native Americans and urban communities.
  • The response to gun violence is often influenced by political considerations.
  • There is a need for a more just and equitable response to gun violence.



Article


The United States has a long and complicated history with guns. From the colonization of Native Americans to the present day, guns have been used to oppress and control minority communities.


In the early days of European colonization, guns were used to forcibly remove Native Americans from their land. The U.S. government also used guns to suppress Native American uprisings, such as the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890.


Today, guns are still used to target minority communities. In urban areas, gun violence is disproportionately high among Black and Latino people. And while there have been some efforts to address gun violence in these communities, they have often been met with resistance from gun rights advocates.


One reason why gun violence in urban communities is not a priority is that it is often seen as a problem that only affects those communities. This is a harmful stereotype that ignores the fact that gun violence can happen anywhere, and that it affects people of all races and backgrounds.


Another reason why gun violence in urban communities is not a priority is that there is a lack of political will to address it. Gun rights advocates have a powerful lobby in the United States, and they have been successful in blocking many efforts to pass gun control legislation.


Finally, the lack of minority gun manufacturers in the United States also contributes to the problem of gun violence in urban communities. Because there are few minority-owned gun companies, there is less competition in the gun market, which can lead to higher prices and less innovation. This makes it harder for people in urban communities to afford guns, and it can also lead to them buying guns from less reputable sources.


The history of gun violence in the United States is a long and complex one. But one thing is clear: gun violence is a problem that affects all of us, regardless of our race or background. We need to work together to address this problem, and we need to do it now.


Sources:


* The Gun Violence Archive: https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/

* The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence: https://www.bradyunited.org/

* The National Urban League: https://www.nul.org/


Call to action


If you want to help address gun violence in urban communities, here are some things you can do:


* Contact your elected officials and urge them to support gun control legislation.

* Donate to organizations that are working to address gun violence in urban communities.

* Volunteer your time to help educate people about gun violence.


Together, we can make a difference.

“Why Are the Laws of America Hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin?”




Abstract 


The laws of America are hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. This can make it difficult for ordinary people to understand the law, and can make it difficult for people to challenge the law.


There are a few reasons why the laws of America are hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. One reason is that the founders of the United States wanted to create a legal system that was based on the principles of English Common Law. They believed that this system would be more stable and predictable than a system based on written codes.


Another reason is that the founders of the United States wanted to create a legal system that would be difficult for ordinary people to understand. They believed that this would make it more difficult for people to challenge the law, and that it would help to protect the power of the elite.


Today, the laws of America are still hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. This makes it difficult for ordinary people to understand the law, and it can make it difficult for people to challenge the law. If the American people want to change the laws in the favor of We the People, they need to make the laws more accessible to ordinary people. They also need to make the laws more transparent, so that people can see how the law is being applied.


Article


The laws of America are hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. This is because the United States was founded by English colonists, and they brought their legal system with them. English Common Law is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means that judges are bound by the precedents of previous cases. This can make it difficult for ordinary people to understand the law, as they have to go back and read old cases to see how the law has been applied in the past.


Civil Law, on the other hand, is based on a code of laws that is written down. This makes it easier for people to understand the law, as they can simply read the code to see what the law says. However, in the United States, Civil Law is often written in Latin, which can make it even more difficult for ordinary people to understand.


There are a few reasons why the laws of America are hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. One reason is that the founders of the United States wanted to create a legal system that was based on the principles of English Common Law. They believed that this system would be more stable and predictable than a system based on written codes.


Another reason is that the founders of the United States wanted to create a legal system that would be difficult for ordinary people to understand. They believed that this would make it more difficult for people to challenge the law, and that it would help to protect the power of the elite.


Today, the laws of America are still hidden in English Common Law and Civil Laws in Latin. This makes it difficult for ordinary people to understand the law, and it can make it difficult for people to challenge the law. If the American people want to change the laws in the favor of We the People, they need to make the laws more accessible to ordinary people. They also need to make the laws more transparent, so that people can see how the law is being applied.


Keywords: law, common law, civil law, english, latin, transparency, accessibility,algorithms 


Call to action:


If you want to change the laws of America in the favor of We the People, you need to make the laws more accessible and transparent. You can do this by:


* Reading about the law and how it works.

* Talking to your elected officials about the need for change.

* Supporting organizations that are working to make the law more accessible and transparent.


Together, we can make the laws of America work for everyone, not just the elite.C

535 Laughing Stocks: |”How America's Congressional Representatives Became a Global Embarrassment”



Abstract 


The United States Congress is supposed to be the world's greatest deliberative body. But in recent years, it has become a laughing stock. From shutdowns and government shutdowns to the partisan gridlock and the endless scandals, America's politics have become a source of ridicule around the world.


And there's no one to blame but the 535 individual Congressional representatives who have turned their institution into a farce. These representatives are more interested in scoring political points than in governing effectively. They're more concerned with lining their own pockets than with serving the interests of their constituents. And they're more interested in tearing each other down than in building anything up.


The result is a Congress that is dysfunctional, ineffective, and increasingly irrelevant. It's a Congress that has lost the trust of the American people. And it's a Congress that has made America a laughing stock on the world stage.


This article explores the reasons why America's Congress has become such a laughing stock. It argues that the 535 individual Congressional representatives are to blame for the institution's dysfunction. And it proposes some solutions for how to hold these representatives accountable and restore the public's trust in our government.


Keywords: Congress, American politics, dysfunction, gridlock, scandal, laughing stock


Article:


The United States Congress is supposed to be the world's greatest deliberative body. But in recent years, it has become a laughing stock.


From the shutdowns and government shutdowns to the partisan gridlock and the endless scandals, America's politics have become a source of ridicule around the world.


And there's no one to blame but the 535 individual Congressional representatives who have turned their institution into a farce.


These representatives are more interested in scoring political points than in governing effectively. They're more concerned with lining their own pockets than with serving the interests of their constituents. And they're more interested in tearing each other down than in building anything up.


The result is a Congress that is dysfunctional, ineffective, and increasingly irrelevant.


It's a Congress that has lost the trust of the American people. And it's a Congress that has made America a laughing stock on the world stage.


What can be done?


There are no easy answers. But one thing is clear: the status quo is not sustainable.


We need to find a way to hold our Congressional representatives accountable for their actions. We need to find a way to make them more responsive to the needs of their constituents. And we need to find a way to restore the public's trust in our government.


It won't be easy. But it's essential if we want to reverse the decline of American politics and restore our country to its former greatness.


Conclusion


The 535 individual Congressional representatives are the ones who are responsible for turning America's politics into a laughing stock. They are the ones who have made our government dysfunctional, ineffective, and increasingly irrelevant.


We need to find a way to hold them accountable for their actions. We need to find a way to make them more responsive to the needs of their constituents. And we need to find a way to restore the public's trust in our government.


It won't be easy. But it's essential if we want to reverse the decline of American politics and restore our country to its former greatness.

3-Poems: |”We Don’t Have Any Rights”|”We the Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States”|”We the Persons”



“We the Persons”


We the people, we the person,

We are all equal, in the eyes of the law.

But what does that mean, when we are not?

When we are treated as less than,

When our rights are taken away?


We the person, we are the voiceless,

We are the forgotten,

We are the ones who are left behind.

But we are not alone,

We are together,

We are strong.


We will not be silenced,

We will not be forgotten,

We will not be left behind.

We are the people,

And we have rights.


“We the Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States”


We Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States,

A case that changed the law,

A case that said that the government,

Can bind us all, without our say.


A case that took away our rights,

A case that said that we are not free,

A case that said that we are just numbers,

In a big government machine.


But we are not numbers,

We are people,

And we have rights.


“We Don’t Have Any Rights’


They say we have rights,

But they don’t mean a thing.

They can take them away,

At any time.


They say we are free,

But we are not.

We are trapped,

In a system that is rigged against us.


We don’t have any rights,

We are just numbers,

In a big government machine.


But we will not give up,

We will not be silenced,

We will fight for our rights,

Until we are free.


“The Poems of Powerlessness”


I hope you like these poems!

Amazon

Truth Be Told: |”Honoring Indigenous Heritage Day: Recognizing Indigenous Day in North West Amexem”|”You Have Been Lied to About the Name of This Land (So-Called America)

Abstract This article sheds light on the importance of acknowledging Indigenous Day instead of Columbus Day, emphasizing the rich cultural h...